August 10, 2009

Unjust Ramphal bashing on 'ethnic cleansing' talk

by Rickey Singh

TALK OF "ethnic cleansing" and "genocide", used occasionally by reckless or frustrated political elements in our Caribbean Community, belong to the lexicon of a diseased political culture that have had horrible manifestations in what was once Yugoslavia and in a few African states.

In our region, we are accustomed to learning, or worse, experiencing, cases of discrimination based on ethnicity and, to a lesser extent, nationality. However strong the claims of such discrimination, the familiar refrain from officialdom has been "not true". Wherever and whenever discrimination, based either on race, religion, nationality or gender occurs, it makes a mockery of provisisons in national constitutions that ensure us of our fundamental rights and of national mottos that salute our unity in diversity, our "oneness" as a people.

Regionally, the "founding fathers" of our Caribbean Community (Caricom), now in its 37th year, had the vision and common sense to record among the first words of the Treaty of Chaguaramas their determination "to consolidate and strengthen the bonds which have historically existed among their people..."

Among the very outstanding West Indian nationals to provide valuable assistance to the region's political directorate to make a reality of Caricom were the likes of William Demas, Shridath Ramphal and Alister McIntyre.

Ramphal was subsequently chosen to lead The West Indian Commission that comprised some of the finest intellectuals and scholars of Caricom and did so while serving as Chancellor of the University of the West Indies.

Those acquainted with his numerous writings and public discourses, the various roles he has fulfilled on behalf this multi-ethnic, culturally diverse region to which his dedication is legendary, would have been quite surprised to learn that Shridath Ramphal was being accused of having engaged in "ethnic cleansing" talk when, in reality he has made no such accusation against any government, any organisation or group.

Yet, without providing text or context, he has been damned with such an utterance in sections of the region's media and even called upon to take back "those words". He remains steadfast in his public silence, privately revealing a mix of amusement and disappointment with his accusers.

Immigration backdrop

The backdrop to this development was the controversial treatment of "illegal" Caricom immigrants in Barbados where a six-month amnesty is in place for them to regularise their status by year end.

I have been personally misrepresented by one media contributor for an "allusion to apartheid", which he claimed I had made in criticising the treatment to which some of those "illegal immigrants" were subjected. The contributor subsequently responded in the media to say "sorry" for that error..

But I continue to be surprised by how anxious some people are to publicly malign, or simply engage the attention of Shridath Ramphal about comments being attributed to him in sections of the regional media about "ethnic cleansing" in the wake of a crackdown by Barbados immigration authorities against illegal immigrants.

If I know anything about the public life of Ramphal, one of the most pre-eminent of our West Indian icons, it is his reluctance to be drawn into public controversies over personal statements or positions adopted by him.

I am, therefore, not holding my breath that Sir Shridath will any time soon, if ever, reply to media reports associating him with "ethnic cleansing" talk and, consequently, "disqualifying" himself as "a voice of reason" on the immigration impasse between Barbados and Guyana.

Nor, do I expect a response from him to the more recent call by former Barbados Central Bank Governor, Sir Courtney Blackman-as reported by journalist Tony Best on July 31-to "consider withdrawing the "ethnic cleansing words" in relation to the immigration impasse, as if he did make such a specific accusation against any country or government.

It would be even more surprising if the author of Inseparable Humanity (an anthology of reflections to mark the "150th Anniversary of the Abolition of Slavery" and the "Beginning of Indian Indenture") responds to an "open letter" in the Barbados Nation of August 4, from the Guyanese trade unionist and political activist Lincoln Lewis, urging him to "intervene" in allegations of human rights abuses in Guyana. I suspect Sir Shridath knows Lewis even better than I do.

However, during this past week, I sought to interest Sir Shridath in a response to his critics over the reported "ethnic cleansing" remark. He restricted himself to pointing me to his address of June 26, at the Inaugural Conference of the Caribbean Association of Judicial Officers, held under the auspices of the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ). He also drew my attention to an editorial in the Barbados Midweek Nation of last June 17, on the immigration controversy.

Context/message

The topic of Ramphal's address was "Caribbean Judiciaries in an Era of Globalisation-Meeting the Challenges". In it, he had also referred, with "sadness", as he said, to the reported treatment of Caricom immigrants in Barbados without any mention to either their ethnicity or nationality.

He quoted the Barbadian visual artist (Annalee Davis, currently involved in a regional project on problems of Caricom immigrants), who had lamented in a media article how West Indians were at times cast as "outsiders" and become "locked into nationalist crevices and exclusive cultural legitimacy."

Ramphal then noted that "we are at such a time; and both policies and practices are deepening Caribbean divides. The knock on the door at night is not within our regional culture; still less are intimations of "ethnic cleansing".

"No Caribbean leader," he stressed, "would countenance such departure from our norms and values; but all must not only believe, but also act as if they believe, that we forget our oneness at our peril; whether the "otherness" that displaces it is an accidental place of our regional birth, or otherness of any kind..."

So why, I asked, was he questioned by a journalist in Georgetown during last month's 30th Caricom Summit, about his reference to "intimations" (the operative word) of "ethnic cleansing"?

Ramphal replied by pointing to the Nation's editorial of June 17, in which was located a surprised warning against "a disturbance of the existing equilibrium among races, a hallmark of Barbadian life".

Perhaps, said Ramphal, rather than "becoming very emotional and judgemental" about his reference to "intimations of ethnic cleansing", those really interested may wish to inquire of the Nation what led to its editorial comment about "a disturbance of the existing equilibrium among races in Barbados".

In that address in June before leading jurists and others of the region, Ramphal, currently engaged in mediating a resolution to the dispute between the West Indies Cricket Board and the West Indies Players Association, was to quote the late Barbadian Prime Minister Errol Barrow, to emphasise "our regional togetherness" as citizens of Caricom.

"My great-great grandfather on my mother's side", he recalled, "came to Guyana from Barbados looking for land and settlement and found them; and so it has been, up and down the chain of island societies that free movement fused into one; freedom curbed, ironically, with the arrival of our separate 'national' freedoms...

"But the roots of those family trees", he added, "are now spread out in the sub-soil of the Caribbean. Social antipathy and divisiveness deny them; but DNAs defy even Constitutions..."

Sunday, August 9th, 2009

Criminal Deportees To Caribbean Tops 50 Thousand Mark In Decade

Deportees being loaded on to a plane for return to the Caribbean (ICE Image)

CaribWorldNews, WASHINGTON, D.C., Fri. July 17, 2009: Over 50,000 convicted Caribbean-born criminals, who have called the U.S. home for many years, have been shipped back to the Caribbean in the past decade under tough U.S. immigration laws, a CaribWorldNews analysis of new Department of Homeland Security data reveals.

The number of criminal deportees sent back to the Caribbean between the decade of 1999 and 2008 totaled 50,589, DHS statistics released this month and analyzed by CWNN reveal.
Last year, the number was at 4,343, a slight increase from 2007, when the total was 4,315. However, it was an improvement from 2005, when the total rose to 5,149, the highest for the decade.

The data comes as Caribbean governments continue to express concern over the rise in criminal nationals, sent back to their country from the U.S., which they say has helped to skyrocket crime rates in many of their countries.

Overall, the Dominican Republic led the way with most criminal deportees received during the decade, a whopping 22,512. Jamaica was behind, receiving a whopping 14,006 criminal deportees during the decade into a country that has seen a huge rise in crime.
Haiti was third with 3,955 criminal deportees received over the ten year period while Trinidad and Tobago, at one time over the decade, dubbed the murder capital of the Caribbean, was sent 2,589 criminal deportees over the ten year period.

Between 1999-2008, Guyana, with a population of less than 800,000 people, was sent 1,742 criminal deportees. The country has in recent years seen its share of brutal crimes.
Some 940 criminal deportees were sent back to the Bahamas over the 10 year period, which has seen a spike in crime recently.

Barbados received 484 for the same period to its 166 sq miles of land while 565 Cuban criminal deportees were sent back to the communist country. Antigua and Barbuda, with a population of 69,000 people, received 303 criminal deportees between 1999-2008 while 177 were sent back to Dominica for the same period.

St. Kitts/Nevis, with a 101 square miles land mass, received 134 deportees who were sent back after serving time for crime in the U.S., while 192 were sent back to St. Lucia over the past decade. The 133 square miles nation of St. Vincent and the Grenadines was sent 202 criminal deportees for the period 1999-2008 while Suriname received only 43.

CARICOM leaders again raised the issue of deportees with President Obama, during his trip to Trinidad and Tobago in April, and again with Attorney General Eric Holder, during his recent trip to Barbados. CARICOM said Obama promised to look at the impact of deportees on crime in the region even as the regional heads called for greater pre-consultation with US authorities before any person is deported from the U.S. to any of its member states.

He added that he (Obama) found there was need for more comprehensive information from the United States and the country receiving the deportee.
CARICOM leaders and Carrington will hold a follow up meeting with the US president before the end of the year in Washington.

The U.S. has refrained from any consideration of a revamp of its laws but in 2007, it signed a contract with the Geneva-based International Organization for Migration (IOM) to work along with the United States Agency for International Development to conduct further consultations on the resettlement of deportees in Guyana, Jamaica and The Bahamas.

Analysis By CWNN Staffers

August 7, 2009

John King and Caribbean Integration

The Peoples Empowerment Party (PEP) would like to publicly congratulate veteran Barbadian calypsonian, John King, on placing second in the Calypso Monarch competition with an outstanding composition about the power, beauty and value of our Caribbean integration movement. John has performed the very laudable service of calming and reassuring the Barbadian people, at a time of tension and apprehension about the relatively large number of CARICOM brothers and sisters who have migrated to Barbados in recent years.

Put simply, John King has helped Barbadians to distinguish the proverbial ‘baby’ from the ‘bath water’! The reality is that whenever there is a substantial inflow of migrants to any country - no matter how useful and valuable those migrants are to the receiving country - there is always a period of tension, uneasiness and sometimes even conflict. But John King’s calypso helps us to look at the bigger picture and to recognise that we are fundamentally all members of the same Caribbean family, and that feelings of tension and uneasiness will pass away as we steadily and progressively embrace each other.

The PEP shares John King’s fundamental optimism about and commitment to the Caribbean! Furthermore, as a Barbadian political party, we are also very proud about the tremendous contribution that Barbados has made to the development of our Guyanese brothers and sisters in recent years.

The reality is that when a country, for whatever reason, finds itself mired in a long and self-perpetuating cycle of poverty, it tends to require some form of outside stimulus or intervention to assist it to break out of that predicament. And Barbados has provided Guyana with the very effective intervening factor of migration and access to a variety of jobs in Barbados’ construction, agriculture and service industries.

For us in the PEP, Barbados’ accommodation and support of a significant number of Guyanese nationals in search of a better life, is something that Barbadians should feel extremely proud about. Barbados has shared its resources and has made a significant contribution to realizing the concept of a ‘Caribbean Civilization’. Let us therefore see our people-to-people relationship with Guyana in a positive light, rather than constantly harping on the negatives!

It is against this background therefore that the PEP has urged the new Democratic Labour Party administration of Barbados to acknowledge and respect the policies of the previous Barbados Labour Party government in relation to intra-CARICOM migration.

Our view is that even if the ‘new’Government wishes to discontinue the old ‘five year amnesty’ policy for CARICOM nationals, and to replace it with a one-off ‘eleven year amnesty’, that they should still extend some special consideration to all those CARICOM nationals who would have qualified for the ‘five year amnesty’ prior to the public announcement of a change of policy on 5th May 2009.

All those undocumented CARICOM migrants who came to Barbados after 1st January 1998 (the cut off date for the new amnesty) but who have resided in Barbados for at least 5 years should be given a guarantee that their applications for status will be seriously considered on merit, and that they will be entitled to remain in Barbados throughout the entire decision making process - inclusive of their right of appeal.

This is the PEP position, and it seems to us that as the national debate continues in Barbados that we are generally settling upon this as the official policy of our country!

The PEP also feels quite strongly that the Barbados government should establish an official, state run ‘Guest Worker Programme’ within the Ministry of Labour that will take the confusion out of the system of issuing short term work permits to CARICOM nationals.

August 4th, 09

August 4, 2009

Dominican ordered deported from Antigua, Jamaican chooses to leave

By Stabroek staff| July 10, 2009 in Regional News

(Antigua Sun) A 50-year-old Commonwealth of Dominica national who pleaded guilty to remaining in Antigua after the expiration of a permit is to be removed from the state, while a 24-year-old Jamaican has opted to leave voluntarily instead of being deported.

The Dominican, Elias Baron, appeared in the St John’s Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday where it was revealed that on Monday, immigration enforcement officers while on duty went to Baron’s house in Paynters where they made inquiries as to his status in the country.

Baron handed over his Dominican passport and the officers reviewed its contents and discovered that his permit to remain in the state had expired since 22 December, 2006.

He was told he had committed an offence and would be charged.

Baron was taken into custody and asked to give a written statement but he declined.

The Dominican man was arrested and charged.

Baron told the court that since coming to Antigua he has never had a permanent job. He said he has done various “odd jobs” and that a number of people owe him money. The 50-year-old added that one of the individuals owe him $4,000, another $1,350 and a third $600.

“They owe me money and refuse to pay. I had a lack of finance,” Baron said.

He speculated that it might have been one of the people who owed him that tipped off the Immigration Department.

Asked why he did not use his return ticket to go back home, Baron told the court that his ticket had already expired.
The Immigration Department is to supervise Baron’s departure from the island.

The AntiguaSun understands that a prominent businessman and the family of an immigration officer are among the people owing money to Baron.

Meanwhile, Olaudah Charlton of Jamaica also appeared in the St John’s Magistrates’ Court and pleaded guilty to remaining in the country after the expiration of a permit.

The man came to the country on 30 May, 2008, and was given an entry permit to stay in Antigua until 27 June, that year.

Court separates Jamaican woman from children

By Stabroek staff| July 2, 2009 in Regional News

(Antigua Sun) – A Jamaican woman was recently severely reprimanded before being ordered deported when she appeared in the St John’s Magistrates’ Court.

Samantha Tanya Peart pleaded guilty to remaining in Antigua and Barbuda after the expiration of a permit legally issued to her by the Immigration Department. She appeared before Magistrate Joan Fung.

The court heard that on 22 June, immigration enforcement officers along with personnel from the Antigua and Barbuda Welfare Department and officers from the Royal Police Force of Antigua and Barbuda acting on intelligence went on a joint operation to Peart’s home in Jennings.

The officers identified themselves to the 28-year-old woman and inquired of her status in the country. She presented to them a Jamaica passport, along with two birth certificates belonging to her children that showed Antiguan nationality.

It was noted from the passport that Peart arrived in Antigua on 24 December, 2000, and was landed until 23 January, 2001. However, the Jamaican woman remained in the state for about one year and four months after the expiration of her entry permit. On 2 April, 2002, Peart received an extension until 2 July, that year. After that permit expired, Peart again remained in the state illegally for seven months, and again obtained an extension on 7 February, 2003, until 6 August, 2003. On 12 August, 2003, she received a work permit valid until 11 May, 2004.

Reports are on 2 March, 2004, Peart acquired a temporary residence permit which was valid until 2 March, 2006. Upon the expiration of this permit the Jamaican woman remained in Antigua illegally, once again.

Peart was taken into custody and detained at the Immigration Department headquarters where she was asked to give a written statement, but she declined.

The 28-year-old Jamaican woman was later arrested and charged.

She told immigration officials, “I don’t mind going home, just give me my children.”

Magistrate Fung granted the deportation order with immediate effect and said that the Immigration Department is to allow her time to collect her personal effects.

Peart asked the court to allow her children to go to Jamaica with her, but the magistrate said the children are Antiguan nationals and their relatives, including their father, were Antiguan. Magistrate Fung told Peart that friends, through the Welfare Department, have agreed to take care of the children.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK: Sir Shridath should take back words

Reprinted from the Nation News

by TONY BEST

"I THINK Sir Shridath Ramphal should consider withdrawing his words."

Sir Courtney Blackman, the first Governor of Barbados' Central Bank and a former ambassador in Washington, was referring to Sir Shridath's use of the term "ethnic cleansing" to describe the effects of Barbados' immigration policy, meaning the deportation of scores of illegal immigrants from the country, especially of Indo-Guyanese descent.

But why should he withdraw the remarks?

Reasons abound, according to Sir Courtney.

For one thing, "ethnic cleansing" is routinely used to describe racially motivated violence and the killings such as what took place in the Balkans by the Serbs more than 20 years ago, or the rampage in Darfur in Africa.

It can also be applied to the actions of the Germans in central Europe during World War II and the killings of hundreds of thousands of people in Rwanda.

For another, the former central banker added, immigrants living in a foreign country must abide by the law, and if they fail to do that, then they can be deported. Living and working in a country without legal permission breaks a nation's immigration law and Barbados has a right to enforce its rules and regulations.

But Sir Courtney, a strong backer of regional migration, was quick to insist that the movement of Caribbean nationals into Barbados had brought benefits to his birthplace and should continue, provided immigrants obeyed the laws.

"We have benefited from that movement," he said from his home in Maryland, just outside of Washington DC.

Still, he insisted, Sir Shridath should pull back his words.

"I think Sir Shridath should take a leaf out of the book of President Obama."

The United States president recently apologised to a white Cambridge, Massachusetts police officer who had arrested black Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates Jr on a charge of disorderly conduct. Obama said that the police had "acted stupidly" but later pulled back his remarks after they sparked a national uproar.

Rickford Burke, president of the Caribbean Guyana Institute for Democracy in New York, and a vocal critic of the Barbados immigration policy, agreed.

"There is no evidence to indicate that the Barbados policy is race-based and no violence has been associated with its implementation," Burke said. "Ethnic cleansing cannot be an appropriate or justifiable description in the case of Barbados."

The Oxford Dictionary defines ethnic cleansing as "the mass expulsion or killing of one ethnic or religious group in an area by those of another".

Sir Shridath's comments were shocking because a public figure of his vast experience and stature should know better.

As a former Commonwealth Secretary-General he should been aware that the use of such emotive language borders on slander of a country and a people, if untrue.

To suggest that Bajans would sit idly by and allow "ethnic cleansing" to occur without an outcry and demands to end it demeans the island.

But where is the evidence to support his contention?

Absolutely none.

Sir Shridath might have to explain why he was seemingly silent on the deportation of Afro-Guyanese from Antigua, Trinidad and Tobago, the United States, Britain and Canada, because they broke those countries' immigration laws but turned to incendiary language when scores of Indo-Guyanese were sent back home from Barbados for doing exactly the same thing?

Is the status of Indo-Guyanese any different from that of the Blacks who were born in that coastal state?

In the United States for instance, Guyanese and other Caribbean immigrants, both Blacks and East Indians, are regularly arrested late at night or early in the morning, picked up at work or at home and ultimately deported for being in the United States illegally. But Sir Shridath hasn't accused Washington of ethnic cleansing.

They have also been deported from Britain where he lived for decades but he didn't descend to such depths.

Why is he treating Barbados in such disrespectful tones? Why would he bring race into an issue where it doesn't belong?

These are legitimate questions which Sir Shridath should answer now that he has improperly brought race hatred into a matter where it should remain out of bounds.

Unfortunately, a somewhat similar thing has happened in Trinidad and Tobago where Dr Tim Gopeesingh, a parliamentarian, recently charged that "ethnic cleansing" of East Indian doctors was taking place at the Port-of-Spain General Hospital after some of them had not been offered contracts to retain their services.

Both the Express and Newsday, two leading dailies in Trinidad, condemned Gopeesingh for his comments. Newsday called the remarks a "gross distortion of events and tarnishing, however unwittingly, of the internationally acknowledged good name of Trinidad and Tobago".

The Daily Express complained that he "was more interested in the political effect than semantic accuracy" in his use of the term.

Clearly Sir Shridath and Dr Gopeesingh can't back up their unfounded allegations and should withdraw them.

July 31st, 09

OUR CARIBBEAN: Lamming's inspiring Conversations

[continuation]

...the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill Campus) with the naming of The George Lamming Pedagogical Centre, in the complex of the Errol Barrow Centre for Creative Imagination.

The naming ceremony coincided with the release of his Sovereignty Of The Imagination - Conversations 3. The trilogy spans 17 years, starting with the first publication in 1992 that offered a most valuable collection of essays, addresses and interviews from 1953 to 1990.

Published by Karia Press in Britain, it was jointly edited by Andaiye of Guyana and Richard Drayton, Guyanese-born citizen of Barbados, as a 300-page work that concluded with an address by Lamming, in which he had appealed: "The most urgent cultural and political task of education is to deepen and nourish the regional consciousness in each territory. A genuine national identity will only be experienced when there is a liberated regional Caribbean of one people." That was in 1986.

In his Coming, Coming Home (Conversations 2), nine years later, based on two lectures and published by House of Nehesi in St Martin and dedicated to the memory of the renowned historian Gordon Lewis, who had made "this archipelago his home", Lamming was to stress at a lecture sponsored by the UWI's Department of West Indian History and the National Cultural Foundation of Barbados:

"I do not think that there has been anything in human history quite like the meeting of Africa, Asia and Europe in this American archipelago we call the Caribbean. But it is so recent since we assumed responsibility for our own destiny, that the antagonistic weight of the past is felt as an inhibiting menace. And that is the most urgent task and the greatest intellectual challenge: how to control the burden of this history and incorporate it into our collective sense of the future . . . ."

Now, in Conversations 3, focused on Sovereignty Of The Imagination (Language And The Politics Of Ethnicity), published earlier this year by House of Nehesi and dedicated to the editors of the first in the series (Andaiye and Drayton), Lamming argues with customary eloquence:

"The concepts of race, nation and ethnicity constitute a family of constructs of largely European origin, which served to influence the attitudes we should adopt to any encounter with difference. European racism was a form of ethnic nationalism that invested the colour line with a power of definition which neither Asian nor African colonised could have escaped . . . ."

A pleasant Emancipation Day to all readers. Walk good!

July 31st, 09

OUR CARIBBEAN: Lamming's inspiring Conversations

...the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill Campus) with the naming of The George Lamming Pedagogical Centre, in the complex of the Errol Barrow Centre for Creative Imagination.

The naming ceremony coincided with the release of his Sovereignty Of The Imagination - Conversations 3. The trilogy spans 17 years, starting with the first publication in 1992 that offered a most valuable collection of essays, addresses and interviews from 1953 to 1990.

Published by Karia Press in Britain, it was jointly edited by Andaiye of Guyana and Richard Drayton, Guyanese-born citizen of Barbados, as a 300-page work that concluded with an address by Lamming, in which he had appealed: "The most urgent cultural and political task of education is to deepen and nourish the regional consciousness in each territory. A genuine national identity will only be experienced when there is a liberated regional Caribbean of one people." That was in 1986.

In his Coming, Coming Home (Conversations 2), nine years later, based on two lectures and published by House of Nehesi in St Martin and dedicated to the memory of the renowned historian Gordon Lewis, who had made "this archipelago his home", Lamming was to stress at a lecture sponsored by the UWI's Department of West Indian History and the National Cultural Foundation of Barbados:

"I do not think that there has been anything in human history quite like the meeting of Africa, Asia and Europe in this American archipelago we call the Caribbean. But it is so recent since we assumed responsibility for our own destiny, that the antagonistic weight of the past is felt as an inhibiting menace. And that is the most urgent task and the greatest intellectual challenge: how to control the burden of this history and incorporate it into our collective sense of the future . . . ."

Now, in Conversations 3, focused on Sovereignty Of The Imagination (Language And The Politics Of Ethnicity), published earlier this year by House of Nehesi and dedicated to the editors of the first in the series (Andaiye and Drayton), Lamming argues with customary eloquence:

"The concepts of race, nation and ethnicity constitute a family of constructs of largely European origin, which served to influence the attitudes we should adopt to any encounter with difference. European racism was a form of ethnic nationalism that invested the colour line with a power of definition which neither Asian nor African colonised could have escaped . . . ."

A pleasant Emancipation Day to all readers. Walk good!

July 31st, 09

...the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill Campus) with the naming of The George Lamming Pedagogical Centre, in the complex of the Errol Barrow Centre for Creative Imagination.

The naming ceremony coincided with the release of his Sovereignty Of The Imagination - Conversations 3. The trilogy spans 17 years, starting with the first publication in 1992 that offered a most valuable collection of essays, addresses and interviews from 1953 to 1990.

Published by Karia Press in Britain, it was jointly edited by Andaiye of Guyana and Richard Drayton, Guyanese-born citizen of Barbados, as a 300-page work that concluded with an address by Lamming, in which he had appealed: "The most urgent cultural and political task of education is to deepen and nourish the regional consciousness in each territory. A genuine national identity will only be experienced when there is a liberated regional Caribbean of one people." That was in 1986.

In his Coming, Coming Home (Conversations 2), nine years later, based on two lectures and published by House of Nehesi in St Martin and dedicated to the memory of the renowned historian Gordon Lewis, who had made "this archipelago his home", Lamming was to stress at a lecture sponsored by the UWI's Department of West Indian History and the National Cultural Foundation of Barbados:

"I do not think that there has been anything in human history quite like the meeting of Africa, Asia and Europe in this American archipelago we call the Caribbean. But it is so recent since we assumed responsibility for our own destiny, that the antagonistic weight of the past is felt as an inhibiting menace. And that is the most urgent task and the greatest intellectual challenge: how to control the burden of this history and incorporate it into our collective sense of the future . . . ."

Now, in Conversations 3, focused on Sovereignty Of The Imagination (Language And The Politics Of Ethnicity), published earlier this year by House of Nehesi and dedicated to the editors of the first in the series (Andaiye and Drayton), Lamming argues with customary eloquence:

"The concepts of race, nation and ethnicity constitute a family of constructs of largely European origin, which served to influence the attitudes we should adopt to any encounter with difference. European racism was a form of ethnic nationalism that invested the colour line with a power of definition which neither Asian nor African colonised could have escaped . . . ."

A pleasant Emancipation Day to all readers. Walk good!

July 31st, 09

July 30, 2009

No sign of missing Haitian migrants

Reprinted from the Jamaica Observer

PROVIDENCIALES, Turks and Caicos Islands (AFP) - Hopes dimmed yesterday for finding some 70 Haitian migrants still missing on the third day of search and rescue operations after their boat capsized in open waters off the Turks and Caicos Islands.

Rescuers continued to scour the area at dawn, but said they were not hopeful they would find more survivors among those who left the Americas' poorest country.

Local police, who are being assisted by the US Coast Guard, discovered overnight another body floating in the shark-infested waters, bringing the death toll to 16 passengers.

They also found one more survivor on the nearby island of West Caicos suffering severe dehydration. Authorities estimate that about 70 of the illegal migrants are still missing after their boat struck a reef, shattered and sank late Sunday.

Authorities have so far rescued 119 passengers - 16 of them on nearby West Caicos island after they managed to swim ashore - and many found clinging to the sharp reefs surrounding the islands.

The coast guard cutter Valiant was on scene searching throughout the night and an HU-25 Falcon jet was launched early yesterday, Johnson said.

An HH-60 Jayhawk helicopter would be launched later in the day for additional search operations, and a C-130 military transport plane was on site.

"It will probably be just a case of picking up more dead bodies. The survivors are in pretty bad shape; worn out, dehydrated and confused," Neil Hall, head of the islands' marine police, said Monday.

Johnson said several searches would take place Wednesday before the coast guard, in consultation with Turks and Caicos Islands officials, would determine the "proper time" to suspend the search.

Migrants from Haiti often undertake perilous journeys aboard precarious and often overcrowded boats headed for other Caribbean islands or the United States."

Thursday, July 30, 2009

July 29, 2009

85 Haitians missing after boat capsizes

Reprinted from Stabroek News

PROVIDENCIALES, Turks and Caicos - An overloaded sailboat carrying Haitian migrants sank off the Turks and Caicos Islands, and as many as 85 people were missing, the United States Coast Guard said yesterday.

An estimated 200 people were aboard the boat when it capsized Monday afternoon, said Petty Officer 1st Class Jennifer Johnson, a Coast Guard spokeswoman in Miami. One survivor said the boat struck a reef as it tried to elude police.

The Coast Guard was optimistic daylight would help it find more survivors.

"We're really hoping we can find as many people as possible," Johnson said.

Rescuers found 113 survivors stranded on two reefs roughly two miles (three kilometres) southeast of West Caicos island. Most of them were ferried to land by Turks and Caicos authorities using small boats.

Two bodies were also recovered, said Lieutenant Commander Matt Moorlag, a Coast Guard spokesman.

The boat had been at sea for three days when those aboard saw a police vessel and accidentally steered the boat onto a reef as they tried to hide, survivor Alces Julien told The Associated Press at a hospital were some survivors were receiving treatment.

Johnson said information from survivors indicated that the boat set out from Haiti with about 160 passengers but stopped at an unknown location and picked up 40 others. She said overloading appeared to be a factor in the accident near this island chain north of Haiti and southeast of the Bahamas.

"These vessels, they are grossly overloaded. Two hundred people on a sailboat is astronomical," she said.

Johnson said the Coast Guard was using a helicopter, a jet and the cutter Valiant, which was sending out smaller search vessels. A C-130 aircraft was expected to join the search.

Turks and Caicos authorities reported the accident Monday to the United States Coast Guard, which patrols the region for drug traffickers and illegal migrants and often helps in search and rescue efforts.

Haitians routinely take to the seas in rickety, overcrowded boats in hopes of escaping poverty in the Western Hemisphere's poorest nation. (AP)

July 29th, 09

6 000 seeking status

Reprinted from the Nation News

THERE IS A BACKLOG OF UP TO 6 000 Caribbean nationals seeking immigrant status in Barbados.

And to clear up the backlog, up to five review panels will have to be established.

This was revealed last night by Prime Minister David Thompson during a nationally televised Press conference from his official residence, Ilaro Court.

According to Thompson, the backlog was largely the fault of the previous Owen Arthur Administration which had failed to take decisive measures to address the issue.

"Most of these applications are old . . . and no action was taken," he said.

The Prime Minister was responding to queries concerning Government's new immigration policy giving Caribbean nationals up to December to regularise this status.

In this regard, he acknowledged that the six-month amnesty had been criticised in some quarters, but stressed that while Government remained committed to the free movement of CARICOM nationals, that Barbados had "to redesign" the commitments previously given.

He said he had made this clear at the last Heads of Government conference in Guyana where it was announced that a new and comprehensive immigration policy would soon be ready for circulation across the region.

He explained that Barbados had no choice but to regulate its immigration policy since the social services simply could not cope with a flood of immigrants.

Thompson also touched on the issue of the treatment of non-nationals who were hustled off to the airport for deportation if it was found that they were here illegally.

To this end, he said a special committee, chaired by prominent lawyer, Keith Simmons QC, had been set up to investigate any complaints that might be made.

"But having said all of this, I just want to make it clear that the position that I previously outlined regarding our immigration policy remains the same," he told reporters. (CG)

July 29th, 09

PM showers Patterson with praise for role in CARICOM

Reprinted from the Jamaica Gleaner

Political leaders buried their differences on Monday to pay tribute to former Prime Minister P.J. Patterson who was recently conferred with the Order of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM).

Leading the way was Prime Minister Bruce Golding and Opposition Leader Portia Simpson Miller.

Golding said Patterson's commitment to Caribbean regionalism was unquestionable.

"No one can question the contribution he has made to Caribbean development. No one can question the quality of leadership he has offered to the Caribbean Community.

"No one can question the respect he commands, the prestige he enjoys, not only throughout the wider Caribbean but indeed as a Caribbean man in any council of the world. He's a remarkable individual," Golding said.

According to Golding, Patterson fully deserved the regional award.

"The award was made with unanimity. Through the many years in which he has been engaged, he has played an important role in defining the principles and goals of the CARICOM movement.

"He was involved in the shaping of the revised Treaty of Chaguaramas and he has been at the helm of so much of what has happened in CARICOM through the transition from the Cold War to globalisation and the significant impact that this has had on the Caribbean," Golding argued.

Time for cooperation

In accepting the award, Patterson said Jamaica's future advance cannot depend solely on its efforts as an island state.

He said Jamaica will have to work with neighbouring countries to overcome the years of neglect.

"While the leaders and the political directorate are trustees for the regional integration movement, it is something that must involve the people and we must find a way to make CARICOM matter to the people, to the business community and to our workers," Patterson said.

The Order of the Caribbean Community is conferred on nationals of member states of the Caribbean Community who have a record of outstanding service and contributions to the political, social and cultural development of the region.

July 29th, 09

July 21, 2009

Song about Guyanese women creating uproar in Barbados

Listen to the song below:

Madd ft Guyanese Girl - GT Advice(Crop Over 2009)

...and listen to the Bajan woman response and read article below:

Thicky Sweets - Keep Yuh Guyanese Wine(Crop Over 2009)

By Gaulbert Sutherland | June 22, 2009 in Local News

Who sleeps in a church dress and petticoat, prepares sardines and biscuits for dinner, covers their bodies in candle grease, snaps like an alligator and calls immigration in matters of a mate?

I would give you the answer but I’m afraid that I’d be banned for life from the Land of the Flying Fish. Not that I’m in a hurry to get there after the song “GT Advice” but I’ve heard that the beaches are among the best in the Caribbean. But that’s minor and there is always St. Lucia anyway.

So a bit of advice for the Guyanese men: appreciate the women in your lives more and never, I repeat never, go looking for that special someone in Barbados. Unless of course…

The Guyanese singer is creating havoc in Barbados if one is to judge by the reaction. “Bees does always find honey, and ants does run to sugar”, ’Guyanese girl’ croons in ‘GT Advice’ and there is no mistake as to who are the sugar and the honey. Written, arranged and produced by Barbadian Eric Lewis, so he must know what he is talking about, ‘GT Advice’ is stirring up controversy in the Land of the Flying Fish and maybe, the truth indeed hurts, because there have been calls to have it banned from the airwaves in that country. The song is an entry for the Crop-over festival there.

‘GT Advice’ takes Barbadian women to task, with a series of low blows and dishes out advice on how to treat the men in their lives.”Do things to mek he hair curl” and put ice cream on a certain part of the body are two of the pieces of advice.

Lewis explained to the Barbados Nation newspaper that the idea for the song came after the recent controversy surrounding Guyanese, after the country’s Prime Minister David Thompson called for the thousands of CARICOM nationals who were illegally in the island to turn themselves into immigration authorities or face deportation from December 1.

Last month, Thompson told the Barbados Parliament that Caribbean nationals living and working illegally in Barbados must begin the process of regularising their immigration status in the country or face deportation if they don’t complete the process by the deadline. He had listed several conditions for regularisation, including proof of employment; an ability to substantiate a claim of residence in the country for at least eight years immediately prior to December 31, 2005; and background security clearance.

“As usual, every year we try to do something new and innovative in order to be still above the rest of the competition, so I was calling for some suggestions for songs and it was during a telephone conversation with Keith Browne, we decided since it was so topical, to find someone to do a song,” Lewis said. He recalled that at first they thought of getting a man to sing about why Bajan men seem to find favour with Guyanese women, but then they decided it would be even better to get a woman to do the song, since they are constantly accused of stealing the men.

“It is a song that half percent of the women will find distasteful, and some of them would have been those on the losing end. I know the song will mash some corns because it is very controversial, but a lot of the things in the song are also true,” he said.

And the internet forums have been busy. According to one contributor “Bajan women don’t need to wine and grind we are independent and don’t need Bajan men to support us. It only shows Guyanese women are taking up our left overs that we throw away. Bajan women don’t wear big panties or cook macaroni and corn beef”.

Not according to the song: “Every night yuh rubbing down, that does turn off de fella

Bengies balsam, citronella, candle grease and alcolada

Yuh sleep in a church dress, petticoat and two brassiere

Got de sheet pull up round yuh neck, and a big parachute underwear

And when de man he pull at you, yuh snap like alligator

Move man, leh muh sleep nuh, I gotta get up early tomorrow

But when he find a Guyanese girl to give him good movementation

Yuh get she deport, yuh run and call immigration”.

Another commentator says: “Guyanese woman have de sugar and de sweet hand too” while another says “…this song has nothing to do with disrespecting ourselves or even having brains its all past that to the emotional and physical side of a relationship that we neglect thinking that education keeps a man…a man needs to feel love, appreciated and treasured just like women.” Some support the song while others do not.

‘GT Advice’ urges the Barbadian women to stop complaining about Guyanese women “thiefing” their husbands and boyfriends and to treat the men “nice”.

The song asks the Bajan women how they expect to “keep a man with corn beef and macaroni”. There is a response to the song entitled ‘Keep yuh Guyanese wine’. The songs have not been heard here as yet but expect them soon.

So its back to the question asked at the beginning. If you haven’t figured it out yet…it’s apparently the Bajan women.

July 20, 2009

On the Map DVD's Now Available

Get your copy of On the Map at a Chubbies Video Store near you. Now available at these locations at a price of $28.75...

Chubbies Video Stores, Barbados:
Haggatt Hall- Trimart Supermarket Complex
Black Rock- Stanmore Crescent
Six Roads- Emerald City Complex
Speightstown- Jordans Complex
Sheraton Mall
Oistins Plaza
Warren's- Super Centre Complex
Julie'n- Julie 'n' Mall Bridge Street

No stay, no school

Reprinted from Stabroek News

Education minister takes firm stance against foreign students
(Antigua Sun) – A stern warning has gone out to non-national parents who may be pondering getting their children into the school system next term.

If the children are in the country vacationing, the Ministry of Education has firmly stated that they will not be enrolled in any educational institution under the government’s oversight in Antigua and Barbuda.

“This year, September 2009, persons who come to Antigua and Barbuda, we are saying to them please enjoy your vacation and return to your country,” Minister of Education Dr Jacqui Quinn-Leandro said during a press conference on Thursday.

“The Ministry of Education will not be issuing any sort of approval for persons who come on vacation and decide when the vacation is up that they are going to stay and attend school.”
Quinn-Leandro made it very clear that the education system cannot take any more non-nationals because there isn’t enough space to comfortably accommodate them.

“It is putting a strain on the education system; we hardly have space in the schools,” Quinn-Leandro said.

The education minister believes that Antigua and Barbuda is waking up to the fact that the movement of people throughout Caricom is having an adverse impact on the social services, not only in the area of education but also in the health services.

According to her, the ministry and the Immigration Department are working together to curb what seems to be a practice.

“Between today and tomorrow, when we place those children who passed in secondary schools, we are pulling out our hair to find places. It is difficult to find places for the children who pass and still find places for persons who are coming in on vacation,“ Quinn-Leandro added. The minister acknowledged that because of Antigua and Barbuda’s Education Act, the government has given some amount of leeway but made it clear that from September 2009, this will not be the order of the day.

The Sun understands that the Immigration Department holds on to a children’s passport if they come to the country on vacation.

Minister of National Security Dr Errol Cort is currently spearheading a team, which will help to formulate an immigration policy for Antigua and Barbuda. This is expected to cover several areas including education and health.

The issue of immigration has recently become a hot button subject not only in Antigua and Barbuda but also throughout the region.

July 18th, 2009

Barbados complying with CSME obligations

Reprinted from the Barbados Advocate

Barbados is fully complying with the obligations under the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME).

This was reiterated on Wednesday evening, by Prime Minister David Thompson, as he addressed a business meeting of the Association of Freemasons.

Mr. Thompson said a recent audit completed by the Single Market and Economy Unit, showed Barbados was fully meeting the requirements.

The Prime Minister stressed that as a nation, Barbados’ record of support for, and contribution to the building of our regional community, was “unparalleled”.
He stated: “All the restrictions have been removed and legislation amended, where necessary. And, where we haven’t amended the legislation, administrative structures have been put in place to realise the objectives.”

Mr. Thompson explained that the successful integration of the interlocking elements of the CARICOM Single Market and eventually Single Economy demanded that the country refocused many of its national institutions from a purely domestic vision, to a wider regional horizon.

Mr. Thompson also pointed out that Barbados was assiduously implementing the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas and seeking to live up to the moral obligations towards the members of the extended regional family. This, he said, meant that all CARICOM states had to overhaul many existing institutions and policies as well as create new ones.

Touching on the freedom of the movement as stipulated under Article Four of the Treaty, the Prime Minister said that this had to be implemented through a phased approach, with the first step being to allow five categories of skilled community nationals to seek employment within their jurisdictions. He explained that nine categories were now in force, five enshrined in the Revised Treaty and four agreed by Heads of Government at the 26th and 27th meetings of the conference.

“Barbados is honouring all its obligations in all nine categories, and by January 1, 2010, it will be ten,” Mr. Thompson maintained.

The Prime Minister disclosed that between 2000 and 2008, Barbados had accepted over 1 000 skilled CARICOM nationals from across the region. He said this country was also in full compliance with the treaty obligations of Articles 32, 34, 36 and 37, to provide for the free movement of non wage earners, either as service providers, or to establish businesses.

July 19th, 2009

July 16, 2009

Immigration Minister retaliates against protest over artists’ visa restrictions

MEDIA RELEASE 15/7/2009, 17:05hrs

Civil liberties campaigners, Manifesto Club, have been waiting for a response from the Government since February 2009 when it launched a petition against new draconian Home Office restrictions that have caused mayhem across arts organizations throughout the UK.
 
The new regulations, which replaced the old work permits system, affect non-EU artists and academics invited by arts organisations to appear or perform in the UK. The campaign was launched with a letter to the editor of The Observer.


The response came yesterday in the form of an angry letter to the Guardian newspaper by the Government Minister.

July 14, 2009

What is Barbados’ capacity to host a CARICOM national migrant population?

by Annalee Davis

Concern has been expressed about the excessive numbers of CARICOM nationals taking up too many places in Barbadian schools. From 2006 – 2007, 2.3% of students in primary and secondary schools were CARICOM nationals, ie. out of 40,276 students, 930 are CARICOM nationals. From July to December 2007, 1,214 students received student visas (including tertiary) and 181 students renewed their visas.

Statistics also show that while some schools are under capacity, others are over capacity. We have 663 students more than we can carry in primary and secondary schools. Although one might think that the presence of CARICOM students is reason for the excess, recall that in 2006, approximately 750 students were transferred from closing of the Louis Lynch school and accommodated into all other secondary schools.

Educational institutions around the world pride themselves on diversity in the student population, thinking that exposure to students from different countries enriches the educational experience. In Barbados, we want to maintain a national student body.

UWI has observed that as a regional institution it’s losing its regional nature and encourages students to spend at least one semester on a sister campus.

While showing my documentary to graduate students at UWI, a student said, “word on the ground is that most crimes are committed by Guyanese.” Not one of his colleagues challenged the statement. Statistics from the Crime Intelligence Unit of the Royal Barbados Police Force reveal that between 2003 – 2007, a total of 22,252 crimes were committed in Barbados, with 1,454 committed by non-nationals; 6.5% of crimes were committed by non-nationals from forty-six countries.

Kai-Ann Skeete, a UWI PhD student, delivered a conference paper in Jamaica recently and quoted Barbados’ Ambassador to CARICOM as saying “We have accepted enough people in Barbados as it stands. We are at the maximum.” But, the maximum has not been qualified numerically. How does Mr. Kellman determine this number? Ms. Skeete showed that out of all landed CARICOM nationals in Barbados for the period July 1 2007 to September 31 2007, 1.08% applied for short term work permits and 69 applied as CARICOM skilled nationals.

Ms. Skeete wrote “if Barbados’ Ambassador persists with his actions, the country with the Lead Responsibility for the implementation of the CSME (Barbados) will continue to disrupt the implementation of the CSME regionally.” She suggested that “the region unite to solve the issues that are currently plaguing the implementation of the CSME and thus the advanced development of our region.”

Officially, back in the late 1970’s, Caribbean nationals were granted amnesty if they had been living in Barbados prior to 1975. The amnesty continued officially until 1992. In 1979, the Immigration Act was amended, endowing the Minister responsible for Immigration the right to allow persons to remain in Barbados and to live and work for three years.

Prime Minister Thompson recently extended the amnesty from 1992 to1998. But this is somewhat passé because even though the amnesty was not officially extended since 1992, the immigration department continued to honour it until the new administration took office.

Given that Barbados has one of the lowest growth rates in the region, an average of less than 1% per annum between 1975 and 2007, and given that the estimate for population growth will be 0.1% by 2025, and given that the aging population is increasing and we need to have increased contributions to the NIS schemes, how many migrants can Barbados support?

July 10, 2009

Oxford University Speech, March 2001 by Michael Jackson

(From www.allmichaeljackson.com)

Thank you, thank you dear friends, from the bottom of my heart, for such a loving and spirited welcome, and thank you, Mr President, for your kind invitation to me which I am so honoured to accept. I also want to express a special thanks to you Shmuley, who for 11 years served as Rabbi here at Oxford. You and I have been working so hard to form Heal the Kids, as well as writing our book about childlike qualities, and in all of our efforts you have been such a supportive and loving friend. And I would also like to thank Toba Friedman, our director of operations at Heal the Kids, who is returning tonight to the alma mater where she served as a Marshall scholar, as well as Marilyn Piels, another central member of our Heal the Kids team.
I am humbled to be lecturing in a place that has previously been filled by such notable figures as Mother Theresa, Albert Einstein, Ronald Reagan, Robert Kennedy and Malcolm X. I’ve even heard that Kermit the Frog has made an appearance here, and I’ve always felt a kinship with Kermit’s message that it’s not easy being green. I’m sure he didn’t find it any easier being up here than I do!
As I looked around Oxford today, I couldn’t help but be aware of the majesty and grandeur of this great institution, not to mention the brilliance of the great and gifted minds that have roamed these streets for centuries. The walls of Oxford have not only housed the greatest philosophical and scientific geniuses - they h ave also ushered forth some of the most cherished creators of children’s literature, from J.R.R. Tolkien to CS Lewis. Today I was allowed to hobble into the dining hall in Christ Church to see Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland immortalised in the stained glass windows. And even one of my own fellow Americans, the beloved Dr Seuss graced these halls and then went on to leave his mark on the imaginations of millions of children throughout the world.
I suppose I should start by listing my qualifications to speak before you this evening. Friends, I do not claim to have the academic expertise of other speakers who have addressed this hall, just as they could lay little claim at being adept at the moonwalk - and you know, Einstein in particular was really TERRIBLE at that.
But I do have a claim to having experienced more places and cultures than most people will ever see. Human knowledge consists not only of libraries of parchment and ink - it is also comprised of the volumes of knowledge that are written on the human heart, chiselled on the human soul, and engraved on the human psyche. And friends, I have encountered so much in this relatively short life of mine that I still cannot believe I am only 42. I often tell Shmuley that in soul years I’m sure that I’m at least 80 - and tonight I even walk like I’m 80! So please harken to my message, because what I have to tell you tonight can bring healing to humanit y and healing to our planet.
Through the grace of God, I have been fortunate to have achieved many of my artistic and professional aspirations realized early in my lifetime. But these, friends are accomplishments, and accomplishments alone are not synonymous with who I am. Indeed, the cheery five-year-old who belted out Rockin’ Robin and Ben to adoring crowds was not indicative of the boy behind the smile.
Tonight, I come before you less as an icon of pop (whatever that means anyway), and more as an icon of a generation, a generation that no longer knows what it means to be children.
All of us are products of our childhood. But I am the product of a lack of a childhood, an absence of that precious and wondrous age when we frolic playfully without a care in the world, basking in the adoration of parents and relatives, where our biggest concern is studying for that big spelling test come Monday morning.
Those of you who are familiar with the Jackson Five know that I began performing at the tender age of five and that ever since then, I haven’t stopped dancing or singing. But while performing and making music undoubtedly remain as some of my greatest joys, when I was young I wanted more than anything else to be a typical little boy. I wanted to build tree houses, have water balloon fights, and play hide and seek with my friends. But fate had it otherwise and all I could do was envy the laughter and playtime that seemed to be going on all around me.
There was no respite from my professional life. But on Sundays I would go Pioneering, the term used for the missionary work that Jehovah’s Witnesses do. And it was then that I was able to see the magic of other people’s childhood.
Since I was already a celebrity, I would have to don a disguise of fat suit, wig, beard and glasses and we would spend the day in the suburbs of Southern California, going door-to-door or making the rounds of shopping malls, distributing our Watchtower magazine. I loved to set foot in all those regular suburban houses and catch sight of the shag rugs and La-Z-Boy armchairs with kids playing Monopoly and grandmas baby-sitting and all those wonderful, ordinary and starry scenes of everyday life. Many, I know, would argue that these things seem like no big deal. But to me they were mesmerising.
I used to think that I was unique in feeling that I was without a childhood. I believed that indeed there were only a handful with whom I could share those feelings. When I recently met with Shirley Temple Black, the great child star of the 1930s and 40s, we said nothing to each other at first, we simply cried together, for she could share a pain with me that only others like my close friends Elizabeth Taylor and McCauley Culkin know.
I do not tell you this to gain your sympathy but to impress upon you my first important point : It is not just Hollywood child stars that have suffered from a non-existent childhood. Today, it’s a universal calamity, a global catastrophe. Childhood has become the great casualty of modern-day living. All around us we are producing scores of kids who have not had the joy, who have not been accorded the right, who have not been allowed the freedom, or knowing what it’s like to be a kid.
Today children are constantly encouraged to grow up faster, as if this period known as childhood is a burdensome stage, to be endured and ushered through, as swiftly as possible. And on that subject, I am certainly one of the world’s greatest experts.
Ours is a generation that has witnessed the abrogation of the parent-child covenant. Psychologists are publishing libraries of books detailing the destructive effects of denying one’s children the unconditional love that is so necessary to the healthy development of their minds and character. And because of all the neglect, too many of our kids have, essentially, to raise themselves. They are growing more distant from their parents, grandparents and other family members, as all around us the indestructible bond that once glued together the generations, unravels.
This violation has bred a new generation, Generation O let us call it, that has now picked up the torch from Generation X. The O stands for a generation that has everything on the outside - wealt h, success, fancy clothing and fancy cars, but an aching emptiness on the inside. That cavity in our chests, that barrenness at our core, that void in our centre is the place where the heart once beat and which love once occupied.
And it’s not just the kids who are suffering. It’s the parents as well. For the more we cultivate little-adults in kids’-bodies, the more removed we ourselves become from our own child-like qualities, and there is so much about being a child that is worth retaining in adult life.
Love, ladies and gentlemen, is the human family’s most precious legacy, its richest bequest, its golden inheritance. And it is a treasure that is handed down from one generation to another. Previous ages may not have had the wealth we enjoy. Their houses may have lacked electricity, and they squeezed their many kids into small homes without central heating. But those homes had no darkness, nor were they cold. They were lit bright with the glow of love and they were warmed snugly by the very heat of the human heart. Parents, undistracted by the lust for luxury and status, accorded their children primacy in their lives.
As you all know, our two countries broke from each other over what Thomas Jefferson referred to as “certain inalienable rights”. And while we Americans and British might dispute the justice of his claims, what has never been in dispute is that children have certain inali enable rights, and the gradual erosion of those rights has led to scores of children worldwide being denied the joys and security of childhood.
I would therefore like to propose tonight that we install in every home a Children’s Universal Bill of Rights, the tenets of which are:
1. The right to be loved without having to earn it
2. The right to be protected, without having to deserve it
3. The right to feel valuable, even if you came into the world with nothing
4. The right to be listened to without having to be interesting
5. The right to be read a bedtime story, without having to compete with the evening news
6. The right to an education without having to dodge bullets at schools
7. The right to be thought of as adorable - (even if you have a face that only a mother could love).
Friends, the foundation of all human knowledge, the beginning of human consciousness, must be that each and every one of us is an object of love. Before you know if you have red hair or brown, before you know if you are black or white, before you know of what religion you are a part, you have to know that you are loved.
About twelve years ago, when I was just about to start my Bad tour, a little boy came with his parents to visit me at home in California. He was dying of cancer and he tol d me how much he loved my music and me. His parents told me that he wasn’t going to live, that any day he could just go, and I said to him: “Look, I am going to be coming to your town in Kansas to open my tour in three months. I want you to come to the show. I am going to give you this jacket that I wore in one of my videos.” His eyes lit up and he said: “You are gonna GIVE it to me?” I said “Yeah, but you have to promise that you will wear it to the show.” I was trying to make him hold on. I said: “When you come to the show I want to see you in this jacket and in this glove” and I gave him one of my rhinestone gloves - and I never usually give the rhinestone gloves away. And he was just in heaven.
But maybe he was too close to heaven, because when I came to his town, he had already died, and they had buried him in the glove and jacket. He was just 10 years old. God knows, I know, that he tried his best to hold on. But at least when he died, he knew that he was loved, not only by his parents, but even by me, a near stranger, I also loved him. And with all of that love he knew that he didn’t come into this world alone, and he certainly didn’t leave it alone.
If you enter this world knowing you are loved and you leave this world knowing the same, then everything that happens in between can he dealt with. A professor m ay degrade you, but you will not feel degraded, a boss may crush you, but you will not be crushed, a corporate gladiator might vanquish you, but you will still triumph. How could any of them truly prevail in pulling you down? For you know that you are an object worthy of love. The rest is just packaging.
But if you don’t have that memory of being loved, you are condemned to search the world for something to fill you up. But no matter how much money you make or how famous you become, you will still fell empty. What you are really searching for is unconditional love, unqualified acceptance. And that was the one thing that was denied to you at birth.
Friends, let me paint a picture for you. Here is a typical day in America - six youths under the age of 20 will commit suicide, 12 children under the age of 20 will die from firearms - remember this is a DAY, not a year - 399 kids will be arrested for drug abuse, 1,352 babies will be born to teen mothers. This is happening in one of the richest, most developed countries in the history of the world.
Yes, in my country there is an epidemic of violence that parallels no other industrialized nation. These are the ways young people in America express their hurt and their anger. But don’t think that there is not the same pain and anguish among their counterparts in the United Kingdom. Studies in this country show that every single hour, three teenagers in the UK inflict harm upon themselves, often by cutting or burning their bodies or taking an overdose. This is how they have chosen to cope with the pain of neglect and emotional agony.
In Britain, as many as 20% of families will only sit down and have dinner together once a year. Once a year! And what about the time-honoured tradition of reading your kid a bedtime story? Research from the 1980s showed that children who are read to, had far greater literacy and significantly outperformed their peers at school. And yet, less than 33% of British children ages two to eight have a regular bedtime story read to them. You may not think much of that until you take into account that 75% of their parents DID have that bedtime story when they were that age.
Clearly, we do not have to ask ourselves where all of this pain, anger and violent behaviour comes from. It is self-evident that children are thundering against the neglect, quaking against the indifference and crying out just to be noticed. The various child protection agencies in the US say that millions of children are victims of maltreatment in the form of neglect, in the average year. Yes, neglect. In rich homes, privileged homes, wired to the hilt with every electronic gadget. Homes where parents come home, but they’re not really home, because their heads are still at the office. And their kids? Well, their kids just make do with whatever emotional crumbs they get. And you don’t get much from endless TV, computer games and videos.
These hard, cold numbers which for me, wrench the soul and shake the spirit, should indicate to you why I have devoted so much of my time and resources into making our new Heal the Kids initiative a colossal success.
Our goal is simple - to recreate the parent/child bond, renew its promise and light the way forward for all the beautiful children who are destined one day to walk this earth.
But since this is my first public lecture, and you have so warmly welcomed me into your hearts, I feel that I want to tell you more. We each have our own story, and in that sense statistics can become personal.
They say that parenting is like dancing. You take one step, your child takes another. I have discovered that getting parents to re-dedicate themselves to their children is only half the story. The other half is preparing the children to re-accept their parents.
When I was very young I remember that we had this crazy mutt of a dog named “Black Girl,” a mix of wolf and retriever. Not only wasn’t she much of a guard dog, she was such a scared and nervous thing that it is a wonder she did not pass out every time a truck rumbled by, or a thunderstorm swept through Indiana. My sister Janet and I gave that dog so much love, but we never really won back the sense of trust that had been stolen from her by her previous owner. We knew he use d to beat her. We didn’t know with what. But whatever it was, it was enough to suck the spirit right out of that dog.
A lot of kids today are hurt puppies who have weaned themselves off the need for love. They couldn’t care less about their parents. Left to their own devices, they cherish their independence. They have moved on and have left their parents behind.
Then there are the far worse cases of children who harbour animosity and resentment toward their parents, so that any overture that their parents might undertake would be thrown forcefully back in their face.
Tonight, I don’t want any of us to make this mistake. That’s why I’m calling upon all the world’s children - beginning with all of us here tonight - to forgive our parents, if we felt neglected. Forgive them and teach them how to love again.
You probably weren’t surprised to hear that I did not have an idyllic childhood. The strain and tension that exists in my relationship with my own father is well documented. My father is a tough man and he pushed my brothers and me hard, from the earliest age, to be the best performers we could be.
He had great difficulty showing affection. He never really told me he loved me. And he never really complimented me either. If I did a great show, he would tell me it was a good show. And if I did an OK show, he told me it was a lousy sh ow.
He seemed intent, above all else, on making us a commercial success. And at that he was more than adept. My father was a managerial genius and my brothers and I owe our professional success, in no small measure, to the forceful way that he pushed us. He trained me as a showman and under his guidance I couldn’t miss a step.
But what I really wanted was a Dad. I wanted a father who showed me love. And my father never did that. He never said I love you while looking me straight in the eye, he never played a game with me. He never gave me a piggyback ride, he never threw a pillow at me, or a water balloon.
But I remember once when I was about four years old, there was a little carnival and he picked me up and put me on a pony. It was a tiny gesture, probably something he forgot five minutes later. But because of that moment I have this special place in my heart for him. Because that’s how kids are, the little things mean so much to them and for me, that one moment meant everything. I only experienced it that one time, but it made me feel really good, about him and the world.
But now I am a father myself, and one day I was thinking about my own children, Prince and Paris and how I wanted them to think of me when they grow up. To be sure, I would like them to remember how I always wanted them with me wherever I went, how I always tried to put them before everything else. But there are also challenges in their lives. Because my kids are stalked by paparazzi, they can’t always go to a park or a movie with me.
So what if they grow older and resent me, and how my choices impacted their youth? Why weren’t we given an average childhood like all the other kids, they might ask? And at that moment I pray that my children will give me the benefit of the doubt. That they will say to themselves: “Our daddy did the best he could, given the unique circumstances that he faced. He may not have been perfect, but he was a warm and decent man, who tried to give us all the love in the world.”
I hope that they will always focus on the positive things, on the sacrifices I willingly made for them, and not criticise the things they had to give up, or the errors I’ve made, and will certainly continue to make, in raising them. For we have all been someone’s child, and we know that despite the very best of plans and efforts, mistakes will always occur. That’s just being human.
And when I think about this, of how I hope that my children will not judge me unkindly, and will forgive my shortcomings, I am forced to think of my own father and despite my earlier denials, I am forced to admit that me must have loved me. He did love me, and I know that.
There were little things that showed it. When I was a kid I had a rea l sweet tooth - we all did. My favourite food was glazed doughnuts and my father knew that. So every few weeks I would come downstairs in the morning and there on the kitchen counter was a bag of glazed doughnuts - no note, no explanation - just the doughnuts. It was like Santa Claus.
Sometimes I would think about staying up late at night, so I could see him leave them there, but just like with Santa Claus, I didn’t want to ruin the magic for fear that he would never do it again. My father had to leave them secretly at night, so as no one might catch him with his guard down. He was scared of human emotion, he didn’t understand it or know how to deal with it. But he did know doughnuts.
And when I allow the floodgates to open up, there are other memories that come rushing back, memories of other tiny gestures, however imperfect, that showed that he did what he could. So tonight, rather than focusing on what my father didn’t do, I want to focus on all the things he did do and on his own personal challenges. I want to stop judging him.
I have started reflecting on the fact that my father grew up in the South, in a very poor family. He came of age during the Depression and his own father, who struggled to feed his children, showed little affection towards his family and raised my father and his siblings with an iron fist. Who could have imagined what it was like to grow up a poor black man in the South, robbed of dignity, bereft of hope, struggling to become a man in a world that saw my father as subordinate. I was the first black artist to be played on MTV and I remember how big a deal it was even then. And that was in the 80s!
My father moved to Indiana and had a large family of his own, working long hours in the steel mills, work that kills the lungs and humbles the spirit, all to support his family. Is it any wonder that he found it difficult to expose his feelings? Is it any mystery that he hardened his heart, that he raised the emotional ramparts? And most of all, is it any wonder why he pushed his sons so hard to succeed as performers, so that they could be saved from what he knew to be a life of indignity and poverty?
I have begun to see that even my father’s harshness was a kind of love, an imperfect love, to be sure, but love nonetheless. He pushed me because he loved me. Because he wanted no man ever to look down at his offspring.
And now with time, rather than bitterness, I feel blessing. In the place of anger, I have found absolution. And in the place of revenge I have found reconciliation. And my initial fury has slowly given way to forgiveness.
Almost a decade ago, I founded a charity called Heal the World. The title was something I felt inside me. Little did I know, as Shmuley later pointed out, that those two words form the cornerstone of Old Testament prophecy. Do I really believe that we can heal this world, that is riddled with war and genocide, even today? And do I really think that we can heal our children, the same children who can enter their schools with guns and hatred and shoot down their classmates, like they did at Columbine? Or children who can beat a defenceless toddler to death, like the tragic story of Jamie Bulger? Of course I do, or I wouldn’t be here tonight.
But it all begins with forgiveness, because to heal the world, we first have to heal ourselves. And to heal the kids, we first have to heal the child within, each and every one of us. As an adult, and as a parent, I realise that I cannot be a whole human being, nor a parent capable of unconditional love, until I put to rest the ghosts of my own childhood.
And that’s what I’m asking all of us to do tonight. Live up to the fifth of the Ten Commandments. Honour your parents by not judging them. Give them the benefit of the doubt.
That is why I want to forgive my father and to stop judging him. I want to forgive my father, because I want a father, and this is the only one that I’ve got. I want the weight of my past lifted from my shoulders and I want to be free to step into a new relationship with my father, for the rest of my life, unhindered by the goblins of the past.
In a world filled with hate, we must still dare to hope. In a world filled with anger, we must still dare to comfort. In a world filled with despair, we must still dare to dream. And in a world filled with distrust, we must still dare to believe.
To all of you tonight who feel let down by your parents, I ask you to let down your disappointment. To all of you tonight who feel cheated by your fathers or mothers, I ask you not to cheat yourself further. And to all of you who wish to push your parents away, I ask you to extend you hand to them instead. I am asking you, I am asking myself, to give our parents the gift of unconditional love, so that they too may learn how to love from us, their children. So that love will finally be restored to a desolate and lonely world.
Shmuley once mentioned to me an ancient Biblical prophecy which says that a new world and a new time would come, when “the hearts of the parents would be restored through the hearts of their children”. My friends, we are that world, we are those children.
Mahatma Gandhi said: “The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.” Tonight, be strong. Beyond being strong, rise to the greatest challenge of all - to restore that broken covenant. We must all overcome whatever crippling effects our childhoods may have had on our lives and in the words of Jesse Jackson, forgive each other, redeem each other and move on.
This call for forgiveness may not result in Oprah moments the world over, with thousands of children making up with their parents, but it will at least be a start, and we’ll all be so much happier as a result.
And so ladies and gentlemen, I conclude my remarks tonight with faith, joy and excitement.
From this day forward, may a new song be heard.
Let that new song be the sound of children laughing.
Let that new song be the sound of children playing.
Let that new song be the sound of children singing.
And let that new song be the sound of parents listening.
Together, let us create a symphony of hearts, marvelling at the miracle of our children and basking in the beauty of love.
Let us heal the world and blight its pain.
And may we all make beautiful music together.
God bless you, and I love you.

Michael Joseph Jackson - August 29, 1958 - June 25, 2009